Skip to main content

Proposed Solutions to Doomsday Asteroids

     The risk of a collision course with asteroids has fueled the imagination of countless writers and movie producers. One lump of rock (ice or something) more than 1 kilometer in size strays away from the asteroid belt or outer solar system and goes on a collision course with Earth. The asteroid upon entry will heat up the Earth's atmosphere and end all life, sharing the same fate as the dinosaurs. Fortunately, we now have enough knowhow to meddle with cosmic affairs, such as landing probes and rovers on extraterrestrial territories. But is it enough to stop a 1-kilometer-big bullet from hitting its 6400-kilometer-big target? I don't know. Watch National Geographic, they have a program specifically tailored to this. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't read on.

     Below are some solutions given by external sources with the details explained from my perspective:

A.) Shooting Lasers from the Moon

Effectiveness: 1/10

Simplicity: 2/10

Feasibility: 0/10

     Let us first assume that shooting lasers from the moon is simple and feasible. We now have our very high gain laser mounted on the moon. Here comes the asteroid and we fire the laser. Did the asteroid stop? Yeah, the asteroid stopped your heart from beating because it looked like it had no effect. Lasers DO NOT cause explosions contrary to Hollywood belief. Laser (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) is simply concentrating light power by stimulating particle radiation at the right frequency (Remember E2-E1=hf). You'd only manage to pierce a tiny hole in the asteroid, given that you had enough energy to begin with.

     As for simplicity, since it would be a laser with very high gain, a lot of amplification stages are required. Plus, the operation would require that the laser could lock on the fast moving asteroid.

     As for feasibility, it is first useful to know that it is extremely hard to transport heavy equipment to outer space. In fact, the heavier and bigger the payload, the harder. The International Space Station wasn't launched to orbit as a whole. It was assembled there. The proposed laser should be bigger than the ISS so it should be also be assembled in outer space or the moon.

B.) Hitting the Asteroid with a Nuclear Bomb

Effectiveness: 3/10

Simplicity: 8/10

Feasibility: 9/10

     The fact that nuclear bombs have been a technology over 40 years old makes this solution very feasible. It is also quite simple since we only have to hit the asteroid. The question is, will it stop the asteroid? It seems logical that it should, considering the havoc nuclear reactions have caused over human history. A problem with effectiveness springs up from the possibility that the chunks/rubble from the explosion would come together again through the same phenomenon that forms planets (i.e. the gravitational forces of the rubble on the locale of the explosion is greater in magnitude than contradicting forces). The asteroid would continue on its collision course.

C.) Pushing/Pulling the Asteroid Off its Course

Effectiveness: 9/10

Simplicity: 3/10

Feasibility: 7/10

     A probe can be constructed with nets/arms to catch the asteroid and give it a little push/pull away from the collision course, never to collide with Earth again. A very effective solution because not only was the problem solved but the chance of recurrence has been erased. Moderately feasible because the mechanisms required are a little complicated. Robot arms have to extend at the right time and at the right amount to accomodate the asteroid's size. Not so simple because the task of catching the asteroid is very complex. The catcher initially has to travel at the same speed to avoid destructive collision. The push/pull has to be at the right direction. Etc. Etc.

D.) Pushing the Asteroid Off its Course by Nuclear Shockwaves

Effectiveness: 8/10

Simplicity: 8/10

Feasibility: 8/10

     To be honest, I just came up with this one. I thought if using probes made the solution complex, then why not use the shockwaves produced from nuclear explosions to push the asteroid instead. We target the asteroid with a nuclear bomb but we don't detonate it at impact but a few hundred meters from impact. The ratings above are just combinations of the ratings from B and C. I'm not a physicist, but this solution seems reasonable to me.

     There are many near-earth-objects that haven't been accounted for. As long as the asteroid belt and external debris (in the Kepler belt?) remain within the heliosphere of the sun, the safety of life on Earth will always be at risk.


Popular posts from this blog

Calculator Techniques for the Casio FX-991ES and FX-991EX Unraveled

In solving engineering problems, one may not have the luxury of time. Most situations demand immediate results. The price of falling behind schedule is costly and demeaning to one's reputation. Therefore, every bit of precaution must be taken to expedite calculations. The following introduces methods to tackle these problems speedily using a Casio calculator FX-991ES and FX-991EX.

►For algebraic problems where you need to find the exact value of a dependent or independent variable, just use the CALC or [ES] Mode 5 functions or [EX] MENU A functions.

►For definite differentiation and integration problems, simply use the d/dx and integral operators in the COMP mode.

►For models that follow the differential equation: dP/dx=kt and models that follow a geometric function(i.e. A*B^x).

-Simply go to Mode 3 (STAT) (5)      e^x
-For geometric functions Mode 3 (STAT) 6 A*B^x
-(Why? Because the solution to the D.E. dP/dx=kt is an exponential function e^x.
When we know the boundary con…

Common Difficulties and Mishaps in 6.004 Computation Structures (by MITx)

May 6, 2018
VLSI Project: The Beta Layout [help needed]Current Tasks: ►Complete 32-bit ALU layout [unpipelined] in a 3-metal-layer C5 process. ►Extend Excel VBA macro to generate code for sequential instructions (machine language to actual electrical signals).
Current Obstacles/Unresolved Decisions:
►Use of complementary CMOS or pass transistor logic (do both? time expensive, will depend on sched.
►Adder selection: Brent-Kung; Kogge Stone; Ladner Fischer (brent takes up most space but seems to be fastest, consider fan-out) [do all? time expensive, will depend on sched.)
►layout requirements and DRC errors

Please leave a comment on the post below for advise. Any help is highly appreciated.

Yay or Nay? A Closer Look at AnDapt’s PMIC On-Demand Technology

Innovations on making product features customizable are recently gaining popularity. Take Andapt for example, a fabless start-up that unveiled its Multi-Rail Power Platform technology for On-Demand PMIC applications a few months back. (read all about it here: Will PMIC On-Demand Replace Catalog Power Devices?) Their online platform, WebAmp, enables the consumer to configure the PMIC based on desired specifications. Fortunately, I got a hands-on experience during the trial period (without the physical board (AmP8DB1) or adaptor (AmpLink)). In my opinion, their GUI is friendly but it lacks a verification method for tuning (i.e. the entered combination of specs). How would we know if it will perform as expected or if there are contradicting indications that yield queer behavior? Also, there is not just one IP available, but many that cater to a differing number of channels and voltage requirements (each with their own price tag).
Every new emerging technology has the potential to oversh…