Skip to main content

Fast Facts: Differential Equations Unraveled

     There has always been some petty difficulty in grasping the intuitive idea of a differential equation, maybe due to the endeavor required in deriving the implication of such or due to the analysis required in arriving at the solution (which can't be easily visualized for a beginner). Thus, in this text I will attempt to explain it in as conceptual an approach can be (but I won't cover technicalities like how to arrive at a solution given this kind of differential equation because any standard textbook can do that).

To begin with, I shall review the basic meaning of a differential:



    Naturally, we aren't very much concerned with the higher derivatives if we are still new to the topic because they represent the rate of change of the rate of change of the rate of change of the rate of change, ... of some characteristic of a system. And if it existed, i.e. the higher order differentials were non-zero, then we would have an extremely unstable system in our hands (can you imagine an object changing acceleration every now and then? -3rd order- and that rate of change changing? -4th order- ) which then becomes a seldom concern of engineers.

     Why do we need differential equations? Because in reality, we are not only dealing with stationary things. Our world, our environment is always changing. Movement (velocity) and the rate of change of that movement (acceleration), centripetal acceleration of revolving objects such as celestial bodies, rate of combustion, rate of growth, rate of dissipation, rate of diffusion, rate of heating and cooling, etc. Differential equations are essential and they are here to stay (at least for the modelling process, later I shall explain why phasors work in simplifying analysis of electrical circuits, and how transforms with different kernels help make differential equation solutions algebraic).

     The solution of a differential equation is the function that will satisfy the differential equation. But what exactly IS a solution to a differential equation. It is simply trying to express the nature of a system in more basic dimensions (the relationship of the displacement with time INSTEAD of the relationship of the velocity/acceleration with time or the relationship of the springs displacement in time instead of the relationship of its damping coefficient, mass, velocity and acceleration with time). We solve differential equations because we want a function/machine that will tell us immediately what the basic dimension y is given an independent variable x.

    The solution of a differential equation always takes a general form composed of 2 parts, the general solution (possessing arbitrary constants) and the particular solution. But why is it that way? What does a general solution mean? Why is there a particular part? Well, the general solution is the solution that can predict the nature of the differential equation given zero initial conditions. In control systems, it is referred to as the natural response. Without an input/initial condition, the general solution suffices. BUT, when there is an input/initial condition to the differential equation (the system being modelled is not at its set point/there is an initial disturbance/the system is not initially in equilibrium), the general solution is not valid and we need a particular solution. Thus, the particular solution is the solution that when added to the general solution will make the entire function valid for a given input/initial condition. The particular solution is commonly called the forced response.

     Phasors are an essential tool in simplifying ac electric circuit analysis. But how exactly do phasors do this for engineers? The nature of inductors and capacitors are mathematically described by differentials, with loops forming differential equations. How could the analysis become a simple "vector" calculation? By assuming that the solution to the differential equation, i.e. the voltage/current in any branch of the circuit will ALWAYS BE SINUSOIDAL IN NATURE. By using exp(j*2*pi*f*t) as the immediate solution to ALL differential equations formed in any loop, the variation will only be in the amplitude and the phase - 2 values represented as x and y - a vector! This immediately implies that phasor analysis is good ONLY for sinusoidal inputs (which is usually ok since a lot can be concluded from the response of a circuit from a single sinusoidal frequency input).

     Now we finally deal with transforms. There is nothing mystifying about transforms, you are simply convolving a function with another function (usually standardized and is complicatedly termed the "kernel" of the transform). (Remember that convolution is like multiplying the frequency content of 2 signals.) If the standard function you convolved with is exponential, we call the convolution a Laplace transform. If the exponential's exponent is complex, we call the convolution a Fourier transform. If we note that an exponential is simply a cosine and complex sine, then we are projecting the function to sines and cosines when we are convolving with an exponential. No wonder you get the spectrum of a signal when you use the Fourier transform since the frequency components of the signal are projected to sinusoids. (Also note that the laplace transform's counterpart is the z transform when we are dealing with discrete-time discrete valued signals)

     So how does the laplace transform help with solving differential equations? I still don't have the intuitive train of thought that leads to the answer but somehow, when you take the laplace transform of a differential/a rate of change, the term becomes algebraic! Then, you do some little simple algebra (like transposing, adding, subtracting...), take the inverse transform and you end up with the solution. There is a catch though, you have to know the initial conditions. If you don't know the initial conditions or you assume that there is none, you won't arrive at the correct solution (unless your assumption is by chance correct).


Popular posts from this blog

Calculator Techniques for the Casio FX-991ES and FX-991EX Unraveled

In solving engineering problems, one may not have the luxury of time. Most situations demand immediate results. The price of falling behind schedule is costly and demeaning to one's reputation. Therefore, every bit of precaution must be taken to expedite calculations. The following introduces methods to tackle these problems speedily using a Casio calculator FX-991ES and FX-991EX.

►For algebraic problems where you need to find the exact value of a dependent or independent variable, just use the CALC or [ES] Mode 5 functions or [EX] MENU A functions.

►For definite differentiation and integration problems, simply use the d/dx and integral operators in the COMP mode.

►For models that follow the differential equation: dP/dx=kt and models that follow a geometric function(i.e. A*B^x).

-Simply go to Mode 3 (STAT) (5)      e^x
-For geometric functions Mode 3 (STAT) 6 A*B^x
-(Why? Because the solution to the D.E. dP/dx=kt is an exponential function e^x.
When we know the boundary con…

Common Difficulties and Mishaps in 6.004 Computation Structures (by MITx)

May 6, 2018
VLSI Project: The Beta Layout [help needed]Current Tasks: ►Complete 32-bit ALU layout [unpipelined] in a 3-metal-layer C5 process. ►Extend Excel VBA macro to generate code for sequential instructions (machine language to actual electrical signals).
Current Obstacles/Unresolved Decisions:
►Use of complementary CMOS or pass transistor logic (do both? time expensive, will depend on sched.
►Adder selection: Brent-Kung; Kogge Stone; Ladner Fischer (brent takes up most space but seems to be fastest, consider fan-out) [do all? time expensive, will depend on sched.)
►layout requirements and DRC errors

Please leave a comment on the post below for advise. Any help is highly appreciated.

Yay or Nay? A Closer Look at AnDapt’s PMIC On-Demand Technology

Innovations on making product features customizable are recently gaining popularity. Take Andapt for example, a fabless start-up that unveiled its Multi-Rail Power Platform technology for On-Demand PMIC applications a few months back. (read all about it here: Will PMIC On-Demand Replace Catalog Power Devices?) Their online platform, WebAmp, enables the consumer to configure the PMIC based on desired specifications. Fortunately, I got a hands-on experience during the trial period (without the physical board (AmP8DB1) or adaptor (AmpLink)). In my opinion, their GUI is friendly but it lacks a verification method for tuning (i.e. the entered combination of specs). How would we know if it will perform as expected or if there are contradicting indications that yield queer behavior? Also, there is not just one IP available, but many that cater to a differing number of channels and voltage requirements (each with their own price tag).
Every new emerging technology has the potential to oversh…