Skip to main content

Capablanca Positions Unraveled



     Perhaps the most challenging and exciting end-games for me as a beginner in chess are the Capablanca positions, where a series of pawns of the same number and an equal amount of officials by value (usually a single bishop/horse) are left on both sides. One simple mistake can be critical and could easily be the deciding factor of a game. Perhaps a strong mental intuition is required to gain an advantage in such an end-game.

     Let us take an example below: (White to move)



     Try and compare 2 moves: Nd2 with the intention of supporting the advance of c4, and d4 with the intention of supporting c5.


Which move is the best? Both seem harmless enough to the new eye.


Let us first have a closer look at Nd2.

Nd2        C5

D4          ...

Why not bxc5? Well bxc5 Bxc5 threatens a3 and g3.

...          dxc4

cxd4      Kb6

Nf3        a5

(by now, white should realize the growing trouble at the left side of the board)

e5         axb4    (white is attempting to break the defense at the right side)

Nd7      Ka5     (black replaces bishop support with King)

Nxf8     bxa3   

Nxg6     ...but too late, a3 will advance first and get promoted giving Black the game. Starting from e5, it would be useless for the knight to support the left side because of the presence of the bishop and king, as well as the number of moves white has to make to be able to make an effective defense. Thus, white chooses to go on the offensive at the right side. The intention of supporting c4 has diminished.


Now what about d4?

d4     a5   (white immediately supports c5 first before mobilizing Nd2)

Nd2  axb4

axb4  Kd6 (since the left side is now unpassable by the King)

Nf3   Bg7

Kd3   Bf6

Ne5   Bxe5

dxe5+   Ke6 (now the game turns in favor of white)

Kd4   ...

The white king has a chance to infiltrate black's defense by c5. Black's defense has crumbled and white wins the game.

     From the 2 scenarios above, it is clear to see how one simple move can decide a win or loss, which makes the Capablanca positions one of my favorite end-games.^_^
















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calculator Techniques for the Casio FX-991ES and FX-991EX Unraveled

In solving engineering problems, one may not have the luxury of time. Most situations demand immediate results. The price of falling behind schedule is costly and demeaning to one's reputation. Therefore, every bit of precaution must be taken to expedite calculations. The following introduces methods to tackle these problems speedily using a Casio calculator FX-991ES and FX-991EX.


►For algebraic problems where you need to find the exact value of a dependent or independent variable, just use the CALC or [ES] Mode 5 functions or [EX] MENU A functions.


►For definite differentiation and integration problems, simply use the d/dx and integral operators in the COMP mode.


►For models that follow the differential equation: dP/dx=kt and models that follow a geometric function(i.e. A*B^x).

[ES]
-Simply go to Mode 3 (STAT) (5)      e^x
-For geometric functions Mode 3 (STAT) 6 A*B^x
-(Why? Because the solution to the D.E. dP/dx=kt is an exponential function e^x.
When we know the boundary con…

Common Difficulties and Mishaps in 6.004 Computation Structures (by MITx)

Updated: 
May 6, 2018
VLSI Project: The Beta Layout [help needed]Current Tasks: ►Complete 32-bit ALU layout [unpipelined] in a 3-metal-layer C5 process. ►Extend Excel VBA macro to generate code for sequential instructions (machine language to actual electrical signals).
Current Obstacles/Unresolved Decisions:
►Use of complementary CMOS or pass transistor logic (do both? time expensive, will depend on sched.
►Adder selection: Brent-Kung; Kogge Stone; Ladner Fischer (brent takes up most space but seems to be fastest, consider fan-out) [do all? time expensive, will depend on sched.)
►layout requirements and DRC errors

Please leave a comment on the post below for advise. Any help is highly appreciated.




Yay or Nay? A Closer Look at AnDapt’s PMIC On-Demand Technology

Innovations on making product features customizable are recently gaining popularity. Take Andapt for example, a fabless start-up that unveiled its Multi-Rail Power Platform technology for On-Demand PMIC applications a few months back. (read all about it here: Will PMIC On-Demand Replace Catalog Power Devices?) Their online platform, WebAmp, enables the consumer to configure the PMIC based on desired specifications. Fortunately, I got a hands-on experience during the trial period (without the physical board (AmP8DB1) or adaptor (AmpLink)). In my opinion, their GUI is friendly but it lacks a verification method for tuning (i.e. the entered combination of specs). How would we know if it will perform as expected or if there are contradicting indications that yield queer behavior? Also, there is not just one IP available, but many that cater to a differing number of channels and voltage requirements (each with their own price tag).
Every new emerging technology has the potential to oversh…