Skip to main content

Four-wire sensing can make or break your measurements

In low voltage and high current applications, it is common to use a measuring instrument capable of 4-wire sensing when it is desired to minimize the effects of resistance between connections (such as wire resistance, alligator-to-pin resistance, alligator-to-alligator resistance and so on) due to a significant voltage drop consequently being induced on those paths. However, disaster can strike when sensing is implemented erroneously; increasing both the magnitude of error (instead of the measurement accuracy) and the number of wrinkles on ones forehead. Such disasters can be avoided if one has a firm grasp on the underlying principle of how sense lines work and if one takes the utmost caution in the practice of such a witty method.

The difference between 4-wire and 2-wire measurement

What is 4-wire measurement anyway and how does it differ from the ordinary 2-wire measurement? 4-wire sensing or 4-terminal sensing as Wikipedia describes it is “an electrical impedance measuring technique that uses separate pairs of current-carrying and voltage-sensing electrodes to make more accurate measurements than the simpler and more usual two-terminal (2T) sensing”. Further annotation by Wikipedia explains the concept as “…a pair of sense connections (voltage leads) which are made immediately adjacent to the target impedance, so that they do not include the voltage drop in the force leads or contacts.” Take for example a 5V source connected to a 2A load through metallic meter sticks. If the meter sticks each have a 1 ohm resistance, then the potential developed at the load would only be 1V. But, by introducing a feedback path (the sense lines) that could say to the 5V source “Hey! I’m only receiving 1V here, so you better increase to 9V?” then the correct/desired voltage level will be impressed at the load. It is self-evident that a 2-wire measurement set-up can’t achieve this self-correcting mechanism due to the absence of the feedback path.

How the 4-wire set-up works


So the 4-wire method is an effective set-up for compensating drops on low resistance paths. But how does it do it electrically? Below is a simple schematic of a 4-wire set-up.

Figure 1 Simplified schematic representation of 4-wire sensing.

As with nearly all feedback paths in electronics, a 4-wire schematic would have the ever ubiquitous operational amplifier. Due to the op-amps impressively high input impedance, it serves as a perfect candidate for sampling voltages in your circuit without having a significant effect. This characteristic is effectively taken advantage of in a 4-wire set-up because of the implication that there will be an infinitesimal voltage drop at R3 and R4. Voltage drops at the sense lines are highly undesirable because that is where the true developed voltage is sampled.

From a block level perspective, the schematic looks like 2 voltage followers, one voltage follower tracking the high end and the other voltage follower tracking the low end (or ground potential).

A danger in 4-wire sensing

The 4-wire set-up has to be practiced with utmost caution in lieu of the possible scenario demonstrated in Fig. 2

Figure 2 4-wire set-up with a floating sense pin.

What happens if one of the SENSE pins is accidentally left floating (like when a cold solder breaks loose or an alligator clip snaps free)? The SENSE lines are now telling the source to keep increasing its voltage because it is just reading a high-impedance (i.e. approx. 0V reading). Eventually, the FORCE lines (R1 and R2) will keep increasing the bias level until the pre-set current limit is reached, possibly destroying the DUT (device under test), or worse, damaging the supply (though a supply is rarely damaged this way if it was manufactured for industry use).

One way I can think of to avoid damaging the supply is by connecting a switch between the SENSE and FORCE lines. See Fig. 3

Figure 3 Possible solution to avoid damaging the supply when a floating SENSE line occurs.

The PROT_EN signal creates a short between the force and SENSE lines when the supply voltage reaches a threshold (maybe on a level that corresponds to the pre-set current limit).

Proper placement of force and sense terminals 


Choosing where to sample voltage (or where to place the sense lines) is crucial to accurate measurement. I recently had a debate with my colleagues on the matter which concerns measuring the characteristic of an LDO. There were 2 bias points for the LDO, one serving as the supply for the protection circuits and extra features of the entire chip [of which I can’t disclose] labelled as VIN and the other as the supply for the main forward path (through the pass transistor) labelled as VINLx. Their argument is that the SENSE line should be connected to VINLx while the force line should be connected to VIN. My argument is the other way around, because VINLx would draw most of the current which would flow through the pass transistor (so the FORCE terminal should be connected to VINLx). What is your opinion on the matter? [See Fig. 4]

Figure 4 Block diagram of LDO with pin-outs.


Popular posts from this blog

Calculator Techniques for the Casio FX-991ES and FX-991EX Unraveled

In solving engineering problems, one may not have the luxury of time. Most situations demand immediate results. The price of falling behind schedule is costly and demeaning to one's reputation. Therefore, every bit of precaution must be taken to expedite calculations. The following introduces methods to tackle these problems speedily using a Casio calculator FX-991ES and FX-991EX.

►For algebraic problems where you need to find the exact value of a dependent or independent variable, just use the CALC or [ES] Mode 5 functions or [EX] MENU A functions.

►For definite differentiation and integration problems, simply use the d/dx and integral operators in the COMP mode.

►For models that follow the differential equation: dP/dx=kt and models that follow a geometric function(i.e. A*B^x).

-Simply go to Mode 3 (STAT) (5)      e^x
-For geometric functions Mode 3 (STAT) 6 A*B^x
-(Why? Because the solution to the D.E. dP/dx=kt is an exponential function e^x.
When we know the boundary con…

Common Difficulties and Mishaps in 6.004 Computation Structures (by MITx)

May 6, 2018
VLSI Project: The Beta Layout [help needed]Current Tasks: ►Complete 32-bit ALU layout [unpipelined] in a 3-metal-layer C5 process. ►Extend Excel VBA macro to generate code for sequential instructions (machine language to actual electrical signals).
Current Obstacles/Unresolved Decisions:
►Use of complementary CMOS or pass transistor logic (do both? time expensive, will depend on sched.
►Adder selection: Brent-Kung; Kogge Stone; Ladner Fischer (brent takes up most space but seems to be fastest, consider fan-out) [do all? time expensive, will depend on sched.)
►layout requirements and DRC errors

Please leave a comment on the post below for advise. Any help is highly appreciated.

Yay or Nay? A Closer Look at AnDapt’s PMIC On-Demand Technology

Innovations on making product features customizable are recently gaining popularity. Take Andapt for example, a fabless start-up that unveiled its Multi-Rail Power Platform technology for On-Demand PMIC applications a few months back. (read all about it here: Will PMIC On-Demand Replace Catalog Power Devices?) Their online platform, WebAmp, enables the consumer to configure the PMIC based on desired specifications. Fortunately, I got a hands-on experience during the trial period (without the physical board (AmP8DB1) or adaptor (AmpLink)). In my opinion, their GUI is friendly but it lacks a verification method for tuning (i.e. the entered combination of specs). How would we know if it will perform as expected or if there are contradicting indications that yield queer behavior? Also, there is not just one IP available, but many that cater to a differing number of channels and voltage requirements (each with their own price tag).
Every new emerging technology has the potential to oversh…