This commentary is by Fred Baser of Bristol, a Vermont Housing Finance Agency Commissioner, a former member of the Addison County Habitat for Humanity board, an Act 250 commissioner, and a former legislator.

Despite recent efforts, in our state and nationally, to reduce the housing affordability crunch, it is quite likely we will be in the same discouraging housing situation 20 years from now as we are today unless we make substantial changes in the way we do business.

How did we get to where we are today? Here are some ideas. 

You'll never miss a story with our daily headlines in your inbox.

Yet, in the decades since the 1950s — when zoning was encouraged, and citizen-controlled planning commissions and zoning boards have taken root in communities around the nation — building housing, especially multifamily units, has become more difficult and costly, especially in desirable growth regions (northwestern Vermont). 

Why? Because people who own nice properties are commonly the ones most active on their local boards and commissions, have political connections, and want to maintain their property values and vision of community. 

They are also the people who dominate local meetings addressing controversial housing projects. The well-educated, more affluent citizens control the local agenda. This circumstance does not favor the creation of affordable housing.

What can we do to have more and smarter affordable housing development?

1. Modify the tax code in such a way to encourage multifamily housing development. Money talks. Big tax breaks for multifamily housing means more of it.

2. Challenge local control in building development. With incentives and or state guidance, revamp zoning rules and regulations to have more flexibility, and lower barriers for multifamily housing and manufactured housing communities.

3. Modify and liberalize Act 250 regs so that costly impediments — like agricultural land mitigation, historic artifact discovery and historic building rules — are nonissues for all housing projects. Sometimes we need to ask not only what the negative consequences to a project are, but what are the consequences of not allowing a project to go forward.

4. We can also open up office, commercial and industrial space to housing.

5. Government will continue to play a role in funding for affordable housing projects. Its programs need to fund diverse economic household units and support projects with sustainable financial budgets.

6. My last thought is to make the Section 8 housing vouchers program an entitlement like Medicaid. Section 8 is used to help our poorest households pay for their rent (no more than 30% on their income; the rest is subsidized). It is my understanding that less than 25% of households that qualify for Section 8 receive funding. That is wrong.

The housing picture that has led to today’s “crisis” has evolved over many decades. Fixing it will take courage. It is worth ruffling some feathers to make shelter available to all. If we don’t, our grandchildren will be dealing with this very same problem.

Our journalism is made possible by member donations. If you value what we do, please contribute and help keep this vital resource accessible to all.

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries a week from a broad range of community sources. All commentaries must include the author’s first and last name, town of residence and a brief biography, including affiliations with political parties, lobbying or special interest groups. Authors are limited to one commentary published per month from February through May; the rest of the year, the limit is two per month, space permitting. The minimum length is 400 words, and the maximum is 850 words. We require commenters to cite sources for quotations and on a case-by-case basis we ask writers to back up assertions. We do not have the resources to fact check commentaries and reserve the right to reject opinions for matters of taste and inaccuracy. We do not publish commentaries that are endorsements of political candidates. Commentaries are voices from the community and do not represent VTDigger in any way. Please send your commentary to Tom Kearney, [email protected]

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For information about our guidelines, and access to the letter form, please click here.

Don't miss the best of VTDigger